<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review:  Ubuntu Linux for Non-Geeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beanworks.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/book-review-ubuntu-linux-for-non-geeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beanworks.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/book-review-ubuntu-linux-for-non-geeks/</link>
	<description>Stuff I'm Working On</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carol Bean</title>
		<link>http://beanworks.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/book-review-ubuntu-linux-for-non-geeks/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Bean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 01:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanworks.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/book-review-ubuntu-linux-for-non-geeks/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Erm. I think while you weren’t looking they changed what being a geek meant. Geeks aren’t the only ones with… iPods.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
lol!  yes, you're right, of course.  I was thinking non-geeks would be more interested in the "productivity" things like word processing, spreadsheets, and accounting than music, games and iPods.  But, of course, that's probably an overbroad generalization. :-)
&lt;blockquote&gt;The ‘glossing over’ of Open Source projects such as Scribus and OpenOffice are probably done because they aren’t ‘Ubuntu’. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Except that those &lt;strong&gt;are&lt;/strong&gt; part of the Ubuntu distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Erm. I think while you weren’t looking they changed what being a geek meant. Geeks aren’t the only ones with… iPods.</p></blockquote>
<p>lol!  yes, you&#8217;re right, of course.  I was thinking non-geeks would be more interested in the &#8220;productivity&#8221; things like word processing, spreadsheets, and accounting than music, games and iPods.  But, of course, that&#8217;s probably an overbroad generalization. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<blockquote><p>The ‘glossing over’ of Open Source projects such as Scribus and OpenOffice are probably done because they aren’t ‘Ubuntu’. </p></blockquote>
<p>Except that those <strong>are</strong> part of the Ubuntu distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taran Rampersad</title>
		<link>http://beanworks.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/book-review-ubuntu-linux-for-non-geeks/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Taran Rampersad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanworks.wordpress.com/2006/10/29/book-review-ubuntu-linux-for-non-geeks/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Erm. I think while you weren't looking they changed what being a geek meant. Geeks aren't the only ones with... iPods. 

The 'glossing over' of Open Source projects such as Scribus and OpenOffice are probably done because they aren't 'Ubuntu'. There's a distinction between Linux as an operating system and the open source software which runs on it which  - admittedly - most non-geeks wouldn't know, and perhaps Grant should have mentioned that in the book a little more clearly for some readers who would think otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm. I think while you weren&#8217;t looking they changed what being a geek meant. Geeks aren&#8217;t the only ones with&#8230; iPods. </p>
<p>The &#8216;glossing over&#8217; of Open Source projects such as Scribus and OpenOffice are probably done because they aren&#8217;t &#8216;Ubuntu&#8217;. There&#8217;s a distinction between Linux as an operating system and the open source software which runs on it which  - admittedly - most non-geeks wouldn&#8217;t know, and perhaps Grant should have mentioned that in the book a little more clearly for some readers who would think otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
